download
Der Artikel wird am Ende des Bestellprozesses zum Download zur Verfügung gestellt.

Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict

 Ebook
Sofort lieferbar | Lieferzeit:3-5 Tage I

15,49 €*

ISBN-13:
9780190864460
Einband:
Ebook
Seiten:
272
Autor:
Cass R. Sunstein
eBook Typ:
Adobe Digital Editions
eBook Format:
EPUB
Kopierschutz:
2 - DRM Adobe
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:
Preface

Introduction

Chapter 1: Reasoning and Legal Reasoning

Chapter 2: Incompletely Theorized Agreements

Chapter 3: Analogical Reasoning

Chapter 4: Trimming

Chapter 5: Understanding (and Misunderstanding) the Rule of Law

Chapter 6: In Defense of Casuistry

Chapter 7: Without Reasons, Without Rules

Chapter 8: Adapting Rules, Privately and Publicly

Chapter 9: Interpretation

Conclusion

Notes

Index
In Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, Cass R. Sunstein, one of America's best known commentators on our legal system, offers a bold, new thesis about how the law should work in America, arguing that the courts best enable people to live together, despite their diversity, by resolving particular cases without taking sides in broader, more abstract conflicts. Professor Sunstein closely analyzes the way the law can mediate disputes in a diverse society, examining how the law works in practical terms, and showing that, to arrive at workable, practical solutions, judges must avoid broad, abstract reasoning. He states that judges purposely limit the scope of their decisions to avoid reopening large-scale controversies, calling such actions incompletely theorized agreements. In identifying them as the core feature of legal reasoning, he takes issue with advocates of comprehensive theories and systemization, from Robert Bork to Jeremy Bentham, and Ronald Dworkin. Equally important, Sunstein goes on to argue that it is the living practice of the nation's citizens that truly makes law.
Legal reasoning can seem impenetrable, mysterious, baroque. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict helps dissolve the mystery. Whether discussing abortion, homosexuality, or free speech, the meaning of the Constitution, or the spell cast by the Warren Court, Cass Sunstein writes with grace and power, offering a striking and original vision of the role of the law in a diverse society. In his flexible, practical approach to legal reasoning, he moves the debate over fundamental values and principles out of the courts and back to its rightful place in a democratic state: to the legislatures elected by the people.

In this Second Edition, the author updates the previous edition bringing the book into the current mainstream of twenty-first century legal reasoning and judicial decision-making focusing on the many relevant contemporary issues and developments that occurred since its initial 1996 publication.

Kunden Rezensionen

Zu diesem Artikel ist noch keine Rezension vorhanden.
Helfen sie anderen Besuchern und verfassen Sie selbst eine Rezension.